Yesterday (July 10, 2011) at "Children's Book-A-Day Almanac,"
Anita Silvey featured Laura Ingalls Wilder's Little House in the Big Woods. She writes that the Little House books "remain one of the best-loved stories of childhood."
Best loved story for whom?
Are they "the best-loved stories of childhood" for everyone?
Little Town on the Prairie has Pa in blackface. Dawn Friedman addresses it in her post "
Pa in Blackface: Confronting racism in our children's books." I don't think everyone would look on this as a "best loved" story. Would you, for example, knowing it has blackface in it, call it one of your best loved stories? (Update, Feb 5, 2013: Added Garth Williams' illustration of blackface, from page 258.) Here's Pa in blackface:
Same thing with
Little House in the Big Woods. On page 53, Pa regales Laura and Mary with his days of youth when he'd pretend he was "a mighty hunter, stalking the wild animals and the Indians." Here's the passage where he said that:
When I was a little boy, not much bigger than Mary, I had
to go every afternoon to find the cows in the woods and drive them home.
My father told me never to play by the way, but to hurry and bring the
cows home before dark, because there were bears and wolves and panthers
in the woods.
One day I started earlier than usual, so I thought I did
not need to hurry. There were so many things to see in the woods that I
forgot that dark was coming. There were red squirrels in the trees,
chipmunks scurrying through the leaves, and little rabbits playing games
together in the open places. Little rabbits, you know, always have
games together before they go to bed.
I began to play I was a mighty hunter, stalking the wild
animals and the Indians. I played I was fighting the Indians, until all
woods seemed full of wild men, and then all at once I heard the birds
twittering 'good night.'
Would you call a book in which the characters romanticize hunting people one of your "best loved" stories?
And of course, there are multiple problems with
Little House on the Prairie. (Scroll down to the "labels" section of AICL and you'll see that I've written about the book several times.)
There is no disputing the love and adoration readers shower on the series, but it is a blind love and a blind adoration that has ramifications for all of us. Thinking of a people as "wild" makes it easier to hunt and kill them. I'm thinking the uncritical embrace of these books is akin to planting seeds that will get watered later when someone deems it in America's best interests to go to war...
I wish that Silvey would take a moment to give her readers a critical view of the Little House series. In her post about Julius Lester, she writes that Lester and Pinkney's
Sam and the Tigers removed "the racial sting" associated with
Little Black Sambo. "Racial sting" is a mild way to reference racist stereotypes, but she did acknowledge the problems with LBS. I wish she could do the same with LHOP.